Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPmGK14igABfEruPPh1X=9KnjY=LquRHQij48oATSo1vWr7yOg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 2:05 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote: > There seems to be no objections, so I went ahead and added the > table/server option ‘async_capable’ set false by default. Attached is > an updated patch. Attached is an updated version of the patch. Changes are: * I modified nodeAppend.c a bit further to make the code simpler (mostly, ExecAppendAsyncBegin() and related code). * I added a function ExecAsyncRequestPending() to execAsync.c for the convenience of FDWs. * I fixed a bug in the definition of WAIT_EVENT_APPEND_READY in pgstat.h. * I fixed a bug in process_pending_request() in postgres_fdw.c. * I added comments to executor/README based on Robert’s original patch. * I added/adjusted/fixed some other comments and docs. * I think it would be better to keep the existing test cases in postgres_fdw.sql as-is for testing the existing features, so I modified it as such, and added new test cases for testing this feature. * I rebased the patch against HEAD. I haven’t yet added docs on FDW APIs. I think the patch would need a bit more comments. But other than that, I feel the patch is in good shape. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: