Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> (2) It seems like there are still a few big questions about this commit:
>>    - Is it wanted at the moment?  It didn't seem like there's a
>>      consensus about whether or not this enhancement should be
>>      merged, even if the patch is pretty minimal.
>>    - It seems like there are two competing patch
>>      sets in play for this enhancement: Joy's and
>>      Peter's.  Presumably at most one of them would
>>      be merged.
>
> These are things that reviews should be helping to decide.  It's probably
> a squishier topic than some patches, but if you're interested, feel free
> to read code and weigh in.

Thanks. It sounds like worst-case scenario, I perform an unneeded
review.  I'll give it a shot.