Re: PgQ and pg_dump
От | Martín Marqués |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PgQ and pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPdiE1xwH8cY9WTUW6zvoeuO3uOqADQ+XN+V9p729gW=+G8T9w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PgQ and pg_dump (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PgQ and pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi Michael, 2016-06-15 5:00 GMT-03:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>: > Martin wrote: >> I wonder if this is the desirable way of handling pgq, or if those >> tables should be dumped. I'm starting to think that this is a PgQ bug, >> or maybe it's not a good idea to install PgQ as an extension. > > As I am looking at that I would qualify that as a bug in pg_dump. > Schemas can be part of the extension definition and be linked to it, > and tables created on top of the schema defined in the extension > should really be dumped.. How would the recovery process work? We expect the schema to be there when restoring the tables? That seems sensible. I'll file a bug report later and maybe move this thread to -hackers. Regards, -- Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: