Re: DEFERRABLE NOT NULL constraint
От | Chris Angelico |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DEFERRABLE NOT NULL constraint |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPTjJmr7m_Vzs9Hq6Jt=OoVxq0zuDkFmkgJ_1ZO8ZF1ozqHR0g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DEFERRABLE NOT NULL constraint (Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto.d.sera@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DEFERRABLE NOT NULL constraint
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:36 PM, B=E8rto =EBd S=E8ra <berto.d.sera@gmail.co= m> wrote: > Hi > >> I still don't see how that's any better than a stored procedure that >> directly does the INSERT. You can conceal the code every bit as >> easily. > > Guys I DO NOT write the customers' security guidelines. I get asked to > produce a design in which "party X will make plain INSERTs and ignore > the very existence of business rules". Can I do it in PG, No. Can I > rewrite the guidelines? No. Hence, PG is not used. Full stop. Sometimes you just have to tell the customer that his/her requirements are impossible to plausibly implement. If you get into a taxi and ask to be driven to New Zealand within the hour, no amount of begging will get you what you want. ChrisA
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: