Re: Remove usage of finalizers ?
От | Tom Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remove usage of finalizers ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPPfruy+mPWfg9WmWQGaRVTAQS9kBgF1pi9oJB4ZcgRyZ87few@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remove usage of finalizers ? (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remove usage of finalizers ?
Re: Remove usage of finalizers ? |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 21 October 2013 23:03, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote: > Please send patches for possible solutions. I think I would be OK with > removing them and letting people find their Statement leaks One option if we want to keep the existing behaviour available in some way would be to remove the finalize method from AbstractJdbc2Statement and create subclasses of the various concrete statement classes which could be used when a debug flag is switched on. e.g. DebugJdbc3Statement, DebugJdbc3PreparedStatement, DebugJdbc3CallableStatement etc which have the finalizer present. There would be quite a few of them though, and we'd need to have a switch everywhere that one of those is instantiated, or introduce a factory. It's a bit gross. IMO tracing non-closed statement leaks is probably better done in a connection pool or jdbc debugging library anyway, so maybe we shouldn't bother and just remove it. One question is this, though: how many users out there aren't closing their statements currently and are relying, accidentally or deliberately, on the current behaviour? Tom
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: