Re: Allow auto_explain to log to NOTICE
От | Tom Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Allow auto_explain to log to NOTICE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPPfruwAzZFndrhqWKs2_digUQmf00oqhqGRyjENGoUh7JcfXw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Allow auto_explain to log to NOTICE (Tom Dunstan <pgsql@tomd.cc>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
(Resent with subscribed email address, thanks gmail)
Hi Andres, thanks for the extremely fast review!
On 27 April 2018 at 11:46, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
OK, sure.
Works for me.
So all of warning, info, debug and debug1-5?
Thanks
Tom
On 27 April 2018 at 11:46, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I don't see any tests for auto_explain so haven't added any test cases.
> Happy to do so if that's deemed necessary.
I'd be in favor of adding them.
OK, sure.
> +static int auto_explain_log_destination = LOG;
I very much dislike this name - it's too similar too the log_destination
GUC, while being about something different. How about "log_level"?
Works for me.
> +static const struct config_enum_entry destination_options[] = {
> + {"log", LOG, false},
> + {"notice", NOTICE, false},
> + {NULL, 0, false}
> +};
I'd argue this should contain the non-error cases. It's just as
reasonable to want to add this as a debug level or such.
So all of warning, info, debug and debug1-5?
Thanks
Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: