Re: BUG #14203: pgindent requires pg_bsd_indent 1.2, but only 1.3 available for download
От | Stephen Thomas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #14203: pgindent requires pg_bsd_indent 1.2, but only 1.3 available for download |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAPPKiq6eumMAZ93nauopyXjMq5OBwUG8GbiiREwfKqOf0U4d-Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #14203: pgindent requires pg_bsd_indent 1.2, but only 1.3 available for download (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Thanks, Tom. You're right, my mistake was assuming that 9.3.3 was pgindent-clean. Now I understand that that's not necessarily the case! And thanks for the pg_bsd_indent patch. There's not much of a difference between the two so I won't worry. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > sthomas@datawareventures.com writes: > > I hacked pgindent to accept 1.3. This time it ran, but changed lots and > lots > > of files. (I assume because pg_bsd_indent 1.3 makes different choices > than > > pg_bsd_indent 1.2.) > > Does anyone know where I can find pg_bsd_indent 1.2? > > I'm not sure why we're not keeping the older tarballs online, but there's > not that much difference between 1.2 and 1.3 --- see attached diff. > > I think your problem may be in expecting that 9.3.x is pgindent-clean. > We don't normally re-pgindent stable branches, so unless committers are > careful to manually indent whatever they back-patch, branches will drift > away from a clean state. If you're trying to validate that you have a > non-broken build of pgindent, I'd suggest checking out the immediately > post-pgindent state from our git repo. The 9.3 run was at commit > 9af4159fc. > > regards, tom lane > > -- Stephen Thomas COO, Dataware Ventures http://www.datawareventures.com
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: