Re: refresh materialized view concurrently
| От | Hitoshi Harada |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: refresh materialized view concurrently |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAP7QgmnZcQwHFJQzrgpjX2rphjLyPSTG5sfPsMmxZxJ0=7tEGA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: refresh materialized view concurrently (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: refresh materialized view concurrently
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> wrote:
-- On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:Attached is a patch for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY for
9.4 CF1. The goal of this patch is to allow a refresh without
interfering with concurrent reads, using transactional semantics.I spent a few hours to review the patch.
Oh, BTW, though it is not part of this patch, but I came across this.
! /*
! * We're not using materialized views in the system catalogs.
! */
Assert(!IsSystemRelation(matviewRel));
! /*
! * We're not using materialized views in the system catalogs.
! */
Assert(!IsSystemRelation(matviewRel));
Of course we don't have builtin matview on system catalog, but it is possible to create such one by allow_system_table_mods=true, so Assert doesn't look like good to me.
Thanks,
Thanks,
Hitoshi Harada
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: