Re: using index "pg_toast_..." despite IgnoreSystemIndexes
От | Michael Wood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: using index "pg_toast_..." despite IgnoreSystemIndexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAP6d-HVctXZkBOz+KxY+vSTw9Ct5FCvSbXF9PKK2kGuFhh=MfA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: using index "pg_toast_..." despite IgnoreSystemIndexes (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
No, you misread that, but Tom has already replied to his other message. On 8/29/12, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:33:22AM -0400, lsq@nym.hush.com wrote: >> Hi >> >> After an upgrade to 8.4.12 from 8.4.10 we vacuum/analyzed the db. > > You downgraded a server? Depending on the fixes in minor releases, that > might not work. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> Postgres is running in standalone mode at this point. >> >> >> vacuumdb --echo --analyze --all --verbose -U sysdba >> >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 INFO: analyzing >> "information_schema.sql_features" >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 INFO: "sql_features": scanned 7 of 7 pages, >> containing 649 live rows and 0 dead rows; 649 rows in sample, 649 >> estimated total rows >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 WARNING: using index "pg_toast_2619_index" >> despite IgnoreSystemIndexes >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 WARNING: using index "pg_toast_2619_index" >> despite IgnoreSystemIndexes >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 WARNING: using index "pg_toast_2619_index" >> despite IgnoreSystemIndexes >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 WARNING: using index "pg_toast_2619_index" >> despite IgnoreSystemIndexes >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 INFO: vacuuming >> "information_schema.sql_implementation_info" >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 INFO: "sql_implementation_info": found 0 >> removable, 12 nonremovable row versions in 1 out of 1 pages >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed >> yet. >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 There were 1 unused item pointers. >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 0 pages are entirely empty. >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec. >> 07/31/12 04:09:57 INFO: vacuuming "pg_toast.pg_toast_11452" >> >> >> I see the warning generated in systable_beginscan_ordered as a >> warning, and then it proceeds to do the work anyway. >> >> It appears as if this is benign. Is that the case? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-novice mailing list (pgsql-novice@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-novice > > -- > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > + It's impossible for everything to be true. + > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-novice mailing list (pgsql-novice@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-novice > -- Michael Wood <esiotrot@gmail.com>
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: