Re: a funnel by any other name
От | Nicolas Barbier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: a funnel by any other name |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAP-rdTbvzossfActc9jNdtFou4kNQr+JdH2wVbrmtd7jK3BYmg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | a funnel by any other name (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: a funnel by any other name
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2015-09-17 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>: > 1. Exchange Bushy > 2. Exchange Inter-Operator (this is what's currently implemented) > 3. Exchange Replicate > 4. Exchange Merge > 5. Interchange > 1. ? > 2. Gather > 3. Broadcast (sorta) > 4. Gather Merge > 5. Redistribute > 1. Parallel Child > 2. Parallel Gather > 3. Parallel Replicate > 4. Parallel Merge > 5. Parallel Redistribute FYI, SQL Server has these in its execution plans: * Distribute Streams: read from one thread, write to multiple threads * Repartition Streams: both read and write from/to multiple threads * Gather Streams: read from multiple threads, write to one thread Nicolas -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: