Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?
От | Goti |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOzfMuo7fp5wN-x7XVqrqF_UErvCGt83vpa0ks++cC6wkcfEdw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers? (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Thanks a lot Dan , Julien and Ron for your inputs.
On Sun, 6 Feb 2022 at 8:51 PM, Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:
If you can't find it in the documentation, then dba.stackexchange would be the place to ask.On 2/6/22 7:43 AM, Goti wrote:Sure Julien. I will ask Amazon too. My intention was just to gather this info IN CASE if someone has already an idea on this. Does that mean that I should not be posting Aurora postgres related questions/ doubts here? Please correct me if I am wrong!Thanks,GotiOn Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 6:55 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:Hi,
On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 05:24:37PM +0530, Goti wrote:
>
> Can someone shed some light as to whether aurora postgres uses wal buffers
> or not? Given the way the writes are handled differently, I would like to
> understand the same while it is being said in the documentation not to
> change the parameter from the default value of 16MB.
It's unlikely that any one here can answer the question. You should ask Amazon,
not us.--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
Thanks,
Goti
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: