Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
| От | Michael Nolan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAOzAquLKPQPrKTBOu-m2dNeCup7viiGvpJThms7F1ZZ72wi8Hg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment (Paul Förster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
My initial impressions were that Oracle did a better job providing tools and options that users and DBAs need and PostgreSQL was pretty much roll-your-own.
Things like being able to copy tables from one database to another or to restore the dump of a table to another table name in the same database are things that would make a DBA's life a lot easier.
I worked on a general-purpose web-based tool that could read the PostgreSQL table structures and provide a form for querying and updating most field types in a table, but never really took it beyond the persona use basis. Now that I'm retired, maybe I"ll work on this again.
--
Mike Nolan
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: