Re: BUG #18663: synchronous_standby_names vs synchronous_commit vs pg_stat_replication
От | Asphator |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18663: synchronous_standby_names vs synchronous_commit vs pg_stat_replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOyVG+vKTug0wC9HV1RBS+_tQXNZu-5LGRgpcqjS5Ra1fCuhvw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18663: synchronous_standby_names vs synchronous_commit vs pg_stat_replication (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hello
I've just made the test and now, indeed, i understand the choice and agree with it.
So basically:
Thx for the push.
I've just made the test and now, indeed, i understand the choice and agree with it.
So basically:
Thx for the push.
Le jeu. 9 janv. 2025 à 13:11, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> a écrit :
On 2025/01/09 9:35, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/10/21 18:43, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2024/10/18 23:48, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>>>
>>> Bug reference: 18663
>>> Logged by: Asphator
>>> Email address: asphator@gmail.com
>>> PostgreSQL version: 15.7
>>> Operating system: RHEL7+
>>> Description:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I would like to raise 2 issues:
>>> - documentation issue
>>> - pg_stat_replication view issue in a very specific use case
>>>
>>> 1. Documentation
>>> Regarding parameter synchronous_standby_names, I did not manage to find
>>> anything in documentation preventing from setting value 0. The only thing
>>> I've found is a comment in a commit of 2016. Would be nice to mention in
>>> documentation that value must be a "positive" integer.
>>
>> Agreed. I've attached the patch.
>
> I made a slight wording adjustment.
> Unless there are objections, I'll commit the attached patch.
Pushed.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
____________________
S'instruire pour vaincre...
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: