Re: [PATCH] Teach pg_waldump to extract FPIs from the WAL
От | David Christensen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Teach pg_waldump to extract FPIs from the WAL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOxo6XJ_pf+cKDXZMvxprvA1x-Pi+-22fq0Tw50o9HgkXg7cTw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Teach pg_waldump to extract FPIs from the WAL (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Teach pg_waldump to extract FPIs from the WAL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 4:45 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 05:01:01PM -0600, David Christensen wrote: > > Hi Justin et al, > > > > Enclosed is v5 of this patch which now passes the CirrusCI checks for > > all supported OSes. I went ahead and reworked the test a bit so it's a > > little more amenable to the OS-agnostic approach for testing. > > Great, thanks. > > This includes the changes that I'd started a few months ago. > Plus adding the test which was missing for meson. Cool, will review, thanks. > + format: <literal><replaceable>LSN</replaceable>.<replaceable>TSOID</replaceable>.<replaceable>DBOID</replaceable>.<replaceable>RELNODE</replaceable>.<replaceable>BLKNO</replaceable></literal> > > I'd prefer if the abbreviations were "reltablespace" and "datoid" Sure, no issues there. > Also, should the test case call pg_relation_filenode() rather than using > relfilenode directly ? Is it a problem that the test code assumes > pagesize=8192 ? Both good points. Is pagesize just exposed via `current_setting('block_size')` or is there a different approach? David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: