Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAOuzzgrqz5Q4+RsaxjcwdWBS2r3A-AipkfgAjBBJhryzWMAApg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Noah,
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 20:52 Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:27:36AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Noah, all,
>
> * Noah Misch (noah@leadboat.com) wrote:
> > This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
>
> Based on the ongoing discussion, this is really looking like it's
> actually a fix that needs to be back-patched to 9.6 rather than a PG10
> open item. I don't have any issue with keeping it as an open item
> though, just mentioning it. I'll provide another status update on or
> before Monday, July 31st.
This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
update.
I'll provide another update tomorrow. Hopefully Michael is able to produce a 9.6 patch, otherwise I'll do it.
Thanks!
Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: