Re: [HACKERS] PUBLICATIONS and pg_dump
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PUBLICATIONS and pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOuzzgrU5jyKT2XoFyui4uFXZX-SPDg3PB=aLEqX84Zf3QgWDg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] PUBLICATIONS and pg_dump (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] PUBLICATIONS and pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter,
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 22:49 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 2/7/17 3:19 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I understand that this is a bit complicated, but I would have thought
> we'd do something similar to what is done for DEFAULT PRIVILEGES, where
> we include the "global" default privileges when we are doing a dump of
> "everything", but if we're dumping a specific schema then we only
> include the default privileges directly associated with that schema.
>
> Perhaps we need to include publications which are specific to a
> particular table, but the current logic of, essentially, "always include
> all publications" does not seem to make a lot of sense to me.
I think it would be sensible to refine it along those lines.
Great! I've added it to the open items list for PG10.
Thanks!
Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: