Re: pgBackRest for a 50 TB database
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgBackRest for a 50 TB database |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAOuzzgqiB9kNpzJNSP1LQpEjHV0A1tL-e+Qx7LB3jkufMPeX+w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgBackRest for a 50 TB database (Abhishek Bhola <abhishek.bhola@japannext.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgBackRest for a 50 TB database
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Greetings,
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 20:08 Abhishek Bhola <abhishek.bhola@japannext.co.jp> wrote:
As said above, I tested pgBackRest on my bigger DB and here are the results.Server on which this is running has the following config:Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 36
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-35
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 18
Socket(s): 2
NUMA node(s): 2Data folder size: 52 TB (has some duplicate files since it is restored from tapes)Backup is being written on to DELL Storage, mounted on the server.pgbackrest.conf with following options enabledrepo1-block=y
repo1-bundle=y
start-fast=y
Thanks for sharing! Did you perhaps consider using zstd for the compression..? You might find that you get similar compression in less time.
Thanks.
Stephen
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: