Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOuzzgpfGt6skZUALhuav0J7qy5Em+X_4in3gS2_WRDA125zzg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes
Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes |
Список | pgsql-docs |
Greetings,
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 21:57 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 09:47:47PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 21:35 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> I normally link to only the _first_ mention of something, and since they
> are both in the same section, I didn't add a link for the second one.
> Adding a second link might suggest that there is more information
> available, even though the coarseness of our links means that section is
> the same.
>
> Perhaps the wording would be better as something like:
>
> New <a href=“…”>predefined roles</a> for granting access to read/write all
> tables have been added, called pg_read_all_data and pg_write_all_data ..?
>
> Or something along those lines?
I have avoided doing that since the link is about the roles, not about
the term "predefined roles".
I tend to agree that it’s about the roles, but it isn’t about just one of them …
> Just a thought.
>
> Perhaps another idea would be to make one link which includes both names.
Uh, that is going to look odd, I am afraid.
This thread started with the point that the current entry looks odd. I’m not sure this would look more odd than what is there now.
Thanks,
Stephen
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: