Re: backup manifests

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:34:52PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> > This is where I feel like I'm trying to make decisions in a vacuum. If
> > we had a few more people weighing in on the thread on this point, I'd
> > be happy to go with whatever the consensus was. If most people think
> > having both --no-manifest (suppressing the manifest completely) and
> > --manifest-checksums=none (suppressing only the checksums) is useless
> > and confusing, then sure, let's rip the latter one out. If most people
> > like the flexibility, let's keep it: it's already implemented and
> > tested. But I hate to base the decision on what one or two people
> > think.
>
> I'm frustrated at the lack of involvement from others also.

Well, the topic of backup manifests feels like it has generated a lot of
bickering emails, and people don't want to spend their time dealing with
that.