Re: Detecting if current transaction is modifying the database
От | Christian Ohler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Detecting if current transaction is modifying the database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOsiKELWOmZM03w-t57ha4n94fqK0pnH8QGfbRjU7dQURHLJWw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Detecting if current transaction is modifying the database (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Detecting if current transaction is modifying the database
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/05/2016 02:15 PM, Christian Ohler wrote: >> >> I'm looking for a statement (or sequence of statements) that, when run >> within a transaction, tells the client if any writes are happening in >> that transaction – basically an interface similar to my proposed >> solution. I have some database wrapper code on the client that passes >> along arbitrary statements to Postgres, and I'd like for that wrapper >> code to be able to determine whether the current transaction is a >> write (for various purposes including logging). It would be nice not >> to make the client-side wrapper code dependent on instrumentation of >> the database schema itself. >> >> What can you tell me about my proposed solution? Does it do what I >> describe I want from it? Are there limitations I should be aware of? > > At what point do you intend to inform the client that the db will be > (significantly) altered? You're planned call is within the transaction and > presumably late in the sequence (so the locks have been created). Not sure > if your client can see any results until after the transaction has been > largely executed. Does that matter? If I'm understanding you correctly, it does not matter – I'm looking for a method to determine whether the current transaction includes any writes _so far_. Thanks, Christian.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: