Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch
От | Atri Sharma |
---|---|
Тема | Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOeZVifPtHw2e79n9HHwx-B_X6UTpZTsoJb1W5mEtnc6K5fOsA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch (Liming Hu <dawninghu@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Liming Hu <dawninghu@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Atri, > > Thanks for the quick response. > > levenshtein edit distance defines operations of: insertion, deletion, > modification. > Levenshtein-Damerau edit distance defines operations of: insertion, > deletion, modification > and transposition ( > it will be two operations in levenshtein edit distance: > one deletion, and one insertion, > ). > > In spelling checker/corrector, i.e. > levenshtein('cta', 'cat') will return 2. > but Levenshtein-Damerau('cta', 'cat') will return 1. > if the maximum error is 1, we can not get 'cat'. > > In practice, Levenshtein-Damerau is more widely used than Levenshtein. > I believe you notice "Google automated search suggestions", they use > Levenshtein-Damerau. > Sounds interesting. How can we build this over our current implementation, or do we need to build it from scratch? Regards, Atri
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: