Re: BUG #15121: Multiple UBSAN errors
От | Martin Liška |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15121: Multiple UBSAN errors |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAObPJ3N+ssZqxh=MmDUKHouT2b2qA-a7PqDeJTAJHUuLkPUtLQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15121: Multiple UBSAN errors (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15121: Multiple UBSAN errors
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
OK guys, you were right, it's miscompilation caused by GCC: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969 Martin On 19 March 2018 at 20:18, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2018-03-19 14:41:23 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: >> > On 2018-03-19 14:20:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> I tried -O3 with gcc 7.3.1 (Fedora 26), and that passes check-world >> >> just fine. Then I tried -O3 with gcc 8.0.1 (prerelease Fedora 28), >> >> and indeed that's got some problems. >> >> >> Note that 1-D and 2-D arrays print fine, it's only 3-D or deeper >> >> that print wrong. Very odd. Maybe it's bad code on our part, >> >> but I think the odds are at least as good that it's a new gcc bug. >> >> > Might be worth trying with a new clang, I think it's been a bit ahead on >> > the quality of the ubsan (et al) integration quality. >> >> I'm not talking about ubsan, I'm just talking about whether our regression >> tests pass with the higher -O level. > > Oh. I think I'll setup two BF animals that continually run using > debian's gcc-snapshot package, once with O0 and once with O3. > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: