Re: Remove PointerIsValid()
От | Jacob Champion |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remove PointerIsValid() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOYmi+nd_cxU=rTaBeRu-E3P1WQUZeJmUJ1DVXXVkb5NSWgt3A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remove PointerIsValid() (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remove PointerIsValid()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:21 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > > I think there is agreement that the PointerIsValid() macro is pretty > useless. This patch proposes to remove it. There have been a few > recent mini-discussions in other threads that appear to support this. [0][1] Patch LGTM, and I like your chosen balance of the two replacements. On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 8:55 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 4:12 AM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > > Given the context of replacing PointerIsValid(x), I think if (foo != NULL) is slightly better than if (x), because thatexplicitly shows the intent of checking pointers, while if (x) works for both pointers and integers. > > I agree that we should prefer foo != NULL, but if the surrounding code > in a particular location just tests if (foo), then it may be better in > that case to go that route. (I find `if (some_pointer)` to be very readable, idiomatic C, so I would vote against standardization.) --Jacob
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: