Re: sslinfo extension - add notbefore and notafter timestamps
От | Jacob Champion |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sslinfo extension - add notbefore and notafter timestamps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOYmi+nMSneR0XYr7Q_fvXtW5fbSEZ_Wt+1SxBHESZA-iMAxPQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: sslinfo extension - add notbefore and notafter timestamps (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: sslinfo extension - add notbefore and notafter timestamps
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:03 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: > The issue here is that postgres use a different epoch from the unix epoch, so > any dates calcuated based on the unix epoch need to be adjusted. Ah, thank you! I had just reproduced Cary's problem and was really confused... > I've hacked > this up in the attached v11 using overflow-safe integer mul/add as proposed by > Jacob upthread (we really shouldn't risk overflowing an int64 here but there is > no harm in using belts and suspenders here as a defensive measure). > > The attached v11 is what I propose we go ahead with unless there further > comments on this. One last question: > + result -= ((POSTGRES_EPOCH_JDATE - UNIX_EPOCH_JDATE) * USECS_PER_DAY); > + return TimestampTzGetDatum(result); Is that final bare subtraction able to wrap around for dates far in the past? --Jacob
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: