Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules
От | Jacob Champion |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOYmi+n2q8rxv9vUirMemMNhiQTRWbSGJpWFO4biQ9FKTrLMXg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules
Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 3:51 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: > I finally understood what you mean. So if the client supports ALPN, but > the list of protocols that it provides does not include 'postgresql', > the server should reject the connection with 'no_applicaton_protocol' > alert. Right. (And additionally, we reject clients that don't advertise ALPN over direct SSL, also during the TLS handshake.) > The attached patch makes that change. I used the alpn_cb() function in > openssl's own s_server program as example for that. This patch as written will apply the new requirement to the old negotiation style, though, won't it? My test suite sees a bunch of failures with that. > Unfortunately the error message you got in the client with that was > horrible (I modified the server to not accept the 'postgresql' protocol): > > psql "dbname=postgres sslmode=require host=localhost" > psql: error: connection to server at "localhost" (::1), port 5432 > failed: SSL error: SSL error code 167773280 <long sigh> I filed a bug upstream [1]. Thanks, --Jacob [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/24300
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: