Re: libpq-oauth: a mid-beta naming check
От | Jacob Champion |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq-oauth: a mid-beta naming check |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOYmi+=xbQcMErUVfUv-RHhRZTbJij9SiRpVG8Y4MiB4BUC8nw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq-oauth: a mid-beta naming check (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq-oauth: a mid-beta naming check
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 2:39 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 at 01:20, Jacob Champion > <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > So, as we approach Beta 3: can anyone think of a way that this plan will fail? > > It's not entirely clear what plan exactly you talk about here. Are you > saying you want to remove the -MAJOR suffix now for PG18? Or you want > to postpone doing that until PG19, when you would have designed a > stable API? That is a PG19 plan. I don't want to make any changes for 18 unless someone can see a fatal flaw; this is just my mid-beta check. > If your goal is to remove this > during-upgrade breakage after PG19, then I'd say that seems totally > fine for a new feature. That's the hope, yes. Thanks! --Jacob
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: