Re: Question for coverage report

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:11 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Per above, I could consider in pguotput.c., line 1495 was actually executed but
> 1503 was counted when it reached line 1494. Another question is why one of the
> branch was reported as 100% and another one was 0%. Is it just because counts
> was less than 1/100?

(I don't know the answer to this question, but I will note that clang
(15.0.7) does not seem to make this mistake on my machine, and reports
a call count of zero for the `return` on line 1495. Looking at the
disassembly, it seems to add more instrumentation points than what Tom
showed for gcc.)

--Jacob