Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOR=d=3CqkNHvznRggv5HvY8C=Pex1EO9XQ2giNKX6VnL8LTyw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres (Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres
Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca> wrote: > Having read the thread, I don't really see how I could study what a > more principled value would be. Agreed. Just pointing out more research needs to be done. > That said, I have access to a very large fleet in which to can collect > data so I'm all ears for suggestions about how to measure and would > gladly share the results with the list. I wonder if some kind of script that grabbed random queries and ran them with explain analyze and various random_page_cost to see when they switched and which plans are faster would work?
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: