Re: New server: SSD/RAID recommendations?
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New server: SSD/RAID recommendations? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOR=d=2kAOKrZoD135n1+AKhw4iOjyhjA3WEsEQodXj_KJCuiA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New server: SSD/RAID recommendations? ("Graeme B. Bell" <graeme.bell@nibio.no>) |
Ответы |
Re: New server: SSD/RAID recommendations?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Graeme B. Bell <graeme.bell@nibio.no> wrote: > > The comment on HDDs is true and gave me another thought. > > These new 'shingled' HDDs (the 8TB ones) rely on rewriting all the data on tracks that overlap your data, any time youchange the data. Result: disks 8-20x slower during writes, after they fill up. > > Do they have power loss protection for the data being rewritten during reshingling? You could have data commited at positionX and you accidentally nuke data at position Y. > > [I know that using a shingled disk sounds crazy (it sounds crazy to me) but you can bet there are people that just wantto max out the disk bays in their server... ] Let's just say no online backup companies are using those disks. :) Biggest current production spinners being used I know of are 4TB, non-shingled.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: