Re: Procedural Languages
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Procedural Languages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOR=d=2X2bUkYmZoqLCao82HG15aYBgKqUv5xmHZqhdfpRGurw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Procedural Languages (Mike Toews <mwtoews@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Procedural Languages
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Mike Toews <mwtoews@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1 June 2012 02:36, John Townsend <jtownsend@advancedformulas.com> wrote: >> There are least 10 Procedural Languages available for PostGreSQL. The one >> that comes with the installation is PL/pgSQL. > > The count looks closer to 18 > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PostgreSQL#Procedural_languages > but I doubt some get much use (PL/LOLCODE anyone?). And don't be surprised if you find one not listed there. For instance, my entire production system runs entirely on pl/bf https://github.com/mikejs/pl-bf It's really the only logical choice for critical and complex financial analysis work.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: