Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOR=d=2N3B-z9vTRfJ6BM26AOJfS779i7CfeLhUOgKepCfabOg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > Patrick, > > > On Friday, September 13, 2013, Patrick Dung wrote: >> >> >What? That's absolutely *not* required for pg_upgrade to work. In >> >general, I would recommend that you make a copy of the database, but >> >it's certainly not required. >> >> I mean the old version and new version would need to take up disk space on >> the server. >> Thus roughly doubled the disk space used. > > > And I'm telling you that pg_upgrade does NOT require that. It has a mode > which allows an in-place upgrade (using hard links) that only requires a bit > of extra disk space- certainly no where near double on a database of any > size. Yeah that was one of the major reasons FOR pg upgrade was that it could upgrade in place and not require a complete copy of the db.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: