Re: OFFTOPIC: core dumped with strcpy,atoi,sprintf.
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OFFTOPIC: core dumped with strcpy,atoi,sprintf. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOR=d=2HwApuy4WzjNd3EVkG=fbhSDkWaL-qwRxrcFPGSVQMzg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OFFTOPIC: core dumped with strcpy,atoi,sprintf. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Ing.Edmundo.Robles.Lopez" <erobles@sensacd.com.mx> writes: >> Debugging the program, found that the core is generated by atoi, >> sprintf and similar functions; because that functions fails when >> received a null pointer (NULL). But, if the functions received an >> empty string ("") the program continues and run succesfully. > >> Yes, I should validate each input pointers. But, its odd that works in >> SCO and not in Linux, and its odder that fails in functions like strcpy, >> atoi, sprintf, etc. > > Not really. Per the POSIX spec, the behavior of those functions is > undefined for NULL input pointers. Some platforms are forgiving about > it, most are not. I learned C on a platform with no memory protection wherein a null pointer would result in a write to location 0 and an immediate machine crash. Wow, that was a LONG time ago (late 80s). Kids today. Got it easy.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: