Re: "Too far out of the mainstream"
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "Too far out of the mainstream" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOR=d=0ervgFyggOhNpyYrmjBW+_0LW3AjPPLV1jYrnO7pR0jA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "Too far out of the mainstream" (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes: >> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older project >>> with a proud heritage (Informix started as a Postgres fork), and top-rate > >> Pretty sure that's not true. Ingres is a cousin of Postgres started >> by the same guy, Stonebraker, but it's not a fork either. > > He didn't say Ingres. Yeah I thought he might have been conflating the two. > Illustra was a commercial fork of Postgres (the pre-SQL versions, I > think). It was later bought out by Informix. I don't have any info > on how much of that code base survives in the modern (IBM-owned) > version of Informix - but one could assume there's at least some. Possibly, but it hardly makes informix a fork of postgres.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: