Re: Postgresql 9.0.6 Raid 5 or not please help.
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql 9.0.6 Raid 5 or not please help. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOR=d=0V9Xf3JRSaGzeRm274vGPXNgV2ur1UanEkd81QbpTjxg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgresql 9.0.6 Raid 5 or not please help. (tuanhoanganh <hatuan05@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql 9.0.6 Raid 5 or not please help.
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:36 PM, tuanhoanganh <hatuan05@gmail.com> wrote: > I have IBM x3560 with 2G RAM - RAID 5 3 disk - PostgreSQL 9.0.6 64bit on > Windows 2003 64bit > I had read some tuning guide, it recomment not use RAID 5. So Raid 5 is > bestter than 3 disk independent or not. > > Here is my pgbench -h %HOST% -p 5433 -U postgres -c 10 -T 1800 -s 10 > pgbench > > pgbench -h 127.0.0.1 -p 5433 -U postgres -c 10 -T 1800 -s 10 pgbench > Scale option ignored, using pgbench_branches table count = 10 > starting vacuum...end. > transaction type: TPC-B (sort of) > scaling factor: 10 > query mode: simple > number of clients: 10 > number of threads: 1 > duration: 1800 s > number of transactions actually processed: 775366 > tps = 430.736191 (including connections establishing) > tps = 430.780400 (excluding connections establishing) RAID 5 is aweful. Look up RAID 1E for 3 disks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_RAID_levels#RAID_1E
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: