Re: Vacuum problem
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOR=d=064LZ-6LJrVXgnjAfe=Cvdq3H0L0fYM64VygpBWeU9Zg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vacuum problem (S H <msq001@live.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vacuum problem
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:27 AM, S H <msq001@live.com> wrote: >> I wonder if you've got a bloated pg catalog then. Certainly sounds >> like it's a possibility. >> So other than vacuuming when you recreate this, is the server working >> hard? What is vacuum vacuuming when this happens (pg_stat_activity >> should show that) > > Does vacuum full is required to avoid bloating, i am running vacuum analyze > regularly but not vacuum full. Normally vacuum full is NOT required on a regular basis. However, if you did something like creation 100M tables and then dropped them, or did it one at a time real fast, you could outrun your autovacuum daemons and get bloat in the pg catalog tables. Just offering a possibility for why a connection might be taking a long time. There's plenty of other possibilities I'm sure.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: