Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing
От | Rafia Sabih |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOGQiiONHzXS3_32SV1uUQVV3ArTTLpCOxoqd_mjwvbxGs4UeQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing (Paul Ramsey <pramsey@cleverelephant.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:55 PM Paul Ramsey <pramsey@cleverelephant.ca> wrote: > > As threatened, I have also added a patch to left() to also use sliced access. Hi Paul, The idea looks good and believing your performance evaluation it seems like a practical one too. I had a look at this patch and here are my initial comments, 1. - if (dp != destend || sp != srcend) + if (!is_slice && (dp != destend || sp != srcend)) return -1; A comment explaining how this check differs for is_slice case would be helpful. 2. - int len = VARSIZE_ANY_EXHDR(str); - int n = PG_GETARG_INT32(1); - int rlen; + int n = PG_GETARG_INT32(1); Looks like PG indentation is not followed here for n. -- Regards, Rafia Sabih EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: