Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range
От | Beena Emerson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOG9ApGe+Gwk39b3L9VtkqX1PQvbBiS0Q99ZO9i63Px=spj3Kw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range (Beena Emerson <memissemerson@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Beena Emerson <memissemerson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jeevan, > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Jeevan Ladhe > <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >> >> 4. >> static List * >> -get_qual_for_range(PartitionKey key, PartitionBoundSpec *spec) >> +get_qual_for_range(Relation parent, PartitionBoundSpec *spec, >> + bool for_default) >> { >> >> The addition and the way flag ‘for_default’ is being used is very confusing. >> At this moment I am not able to think about a alternate solution to the >> way you have used this flag. But will try and see if I can come up with >> an alternate approach. > > Well, we need to skip the get_range_nulltest while collecting the qual > of other partition to make one for default. We could skip this flag > and remove the NullTest from the qual returned for each partition but > I am not sure if thats a good way to go about it. > > Please find attached a patch which removes the for_default flag from the get_qual_for_range function. This patch is just to show an idea and should be applied over my earlier patch. There could be a better way to do this. Let me know your opinion. -- Beena Emerson EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: