Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
От | Beena Emerson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOG9ApFvQpJE1DPqwkcC8gd69hoAxPdz0kmK5FBNOLbGLG9Jpg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Amit, On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2017/08/05 2:25, Robert Haas wrote: >> Concretely, my proposal is: >> >> P.S. While I haven't reviewed 0002 in detail, I think the concept of >> minimizing what needs to be built in RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo >> is a very good idea. > > I put this patch ahead in the list and so it's now 0001. > FYI, 0001 patch throws the warning: execMain.c: In function ‘ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting’: execMain.c:3342:16: warning: ‘next_ptinfo’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] next_ptinfo->parentid != ptinfo->parentid) -- Beena Emerson EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: