Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
От | Beena Emerson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOG9ApE-EwygeYpkxroneL=dDWXwXHFkAORn=jBiCT-Dn9DLbw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size (tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
Thank you testing. I just wanted to confirm few things since I do not have linux32 setup yet.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:09 PM, tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On 03/10/2017 11:23 AM, Beena Emerson wrote:We (Prabhat and I) have started basic testing of this feature -Thank you for your reviews Kuntal, Jim, AshutoshAttached in an updated 02 patch which:
- Call RetrieveXLogSegSize(conn) in pg_receivewal.c
- Remove the warning in Windows
- Change PATH_MAX in pg_waldump with MAXPGPATH
Regarding the usage of the wal file size as the XLogSegSize, I agree with what Robert has said. Generally, the wal size will be of the expected wal_segment_size and to have it any other size, esspecially of a valid power2 value is extremely rare and I feel it is not a major cause of concern.
2 quick issue -
1)at the time of initdb, we have set - "--wal-segsize 4" ,so all the WAL file size should be 4 MB each but in the postgresql.conf file , it is mentioned
#wal_keep_segments = 0 # in logfile segments, 16MB each; 0 disables
so the comment (16MB ) mentioned against parameter 'wal_keep_segments' looks wrong , either we should remove this or modify it .
2)Getting "Aborted (core dumped)" error at the time of running pg_basebackup , (this issue is only coming on Linux32 ,not on Linux64)
we have double check to confirm it .
Steps to reproduce on Linux32
===================
fetch the sources
apply both the patches
./configure --with-zlib --enable-debug --enable-cassert --enable-depend --prefix=$PWD/edbpsql --with-openssl CFLAGS="-g -O0"; make all install
Performed initdb with switch "--wal-segsize 4"
Does the crash occur with only size 4?
start the server
run pg_basebackup
[centos@tushar-centos bin]$ ./pg_basebackup -v -D /tmp/myslave
*** glibc detected *** ./pg_basebackup: free(): invalid pointer: 0x08da7f00 ***
[centos@tushar-centos bin]$
same scenario is working fine against HEAD (v10 ) on Linux32 [i.e no patch applied]
[centos@tushar-centos bin]$ ./pg_basebackup --verbose -D /tmp/slave11
pg_basebackup: initiating base backup, waiting for checkpoint to complete
pg_basebackup: checkpoint completed
pg_basebackup: transaction log start point: 0/2800024 on timeline 1
pg_basebackup: starting background WAL receiver
pg_basebackup: transaction log end point: 0/28000E4
pg_basebackup: waiting for background process to finish streaming ...
pg_basebackup: base backup completed
[centos@tushar-centos bin]$
Just to confirm, was this done with configure flag --with-wal-segsize=4 ?
Thank you,
Beena Emerson
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: