Re: [GENERAL] Inconsistent performance with LIKE and bind variable onlong-lived connection
От | Steven Grimm |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Inconsistent performance with LIKE and bind variable onlong-lived connection |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOFXwWVbUwptwXVDTMa6vXRmGfqBtfqCTHmmX+ua9R23rq2Hsw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Inconsistent performance with LIKE and bind variable on long-lived connection (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Inconsistent performance with LIKE and bind variable onlong-lived connection
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Yeah, I've been watching this thread and trying to figure out how to
explain that part; I suspected a cause of this form but couldn't
make that theory match the 9-iterations observation. (I still can't.)
I walked through the Java code in a debugger just now and have an explanation for the 5 vs. 9 discrepancy. The JDBC driver keeps a cache of queries that have been passed to a connection's prepareStatement() method, and inlines the bind values the first 4 times it sees a query in the hopes of reducing overhead on one-off queries. So I believe the sequence ends up being:
1-4: JDBC driver inlines the values, server sees no bind variables
5: JDBC driver prepares the statement, server sees bind variables and tries generic plan
6+: JDBC driver reuses the existing prepared statement from iteration 5
10: Server has seen the query 5 times before and switches to the custom plan
As for the broader problem, at the risk of being hopelessly naive about how all this works internally: Could the discrepancy between the estimated and actual row counts be tracked and fed back into the planner somehow?
-Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: