Re: Issue with pg_basebackup v.11
От | Ninad Shah |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issue with pg_basebackup v.11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOFEiBfP3nUsuua8-5UG24otLfr-F26YKzHNbrc_CG0dH6ywoQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issue with pg_basebackup v.11 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issue with pg_basebackup v.11
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hey Tom,
Thank you for your response. Actually, when we copy data using scp/rsync, it works without any issue. But, it fails while attempting to transfer using pg_basebackup.
Would keepalive setting address and mitigate the issue?
Regards,
Ninad Shah
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 21:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Ninad Shah <nshah.postgres@gmail.com> writes:
> What I observed is that it takes a couple of hours between below 2 lines.
> 115454656/1304172127 kB (8%), 0/1 tablespace
> (...atastaging/base/115868/154220.2)
> pgbasebackup: could not read COPY data: could not receive data from server:
> Connection timed out
We have heard reports of network connections dropping while pg_basebackup
is busy doing something disk-intensive such as fsync'ing. The apparent
2-hour delay here does not mean that pg_basebackup was out to lunch for
2 hours; more likely that reflects the TCP timeout delay before the kernel
realizes that the connection is lost. The actual blame probably resides
with some firewall or router that has a short timeout for idle
connections.
I'd try turning on fairly aggressive TCP keepalive settings for the
connection, say keepalives_idle=30 or so.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: