Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOBaU_aarvh=TmqqpPq1PpM6aaYDmWnVHX0hLeubrrKyvc6n1g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Ashutosh Bapat > <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> With 9140cf8269b0c4ae002b2748d93979d535891311, we store the >> RelOptInfos of partitions in the RelOptInfo of partitioned table. For >> range partitioned table without default partition, they are arranged >> in the ascending order of partition bounds. This patch may avoid >> MergeAppend if the sort keys match partition keys by creating an >> Append path by picking sorted paths from partition RelOptInfos in >> order. You may use slightly modified version of >> add_paths_to_append_rel(). > > > Yes, I just saw this commit this morning, and this is exactly what I > was missing, thanks for the pointer and the patch! PFA v3 of the patch, once again rebased and that now use all the newly available infrastructure. I also added a check that a sorted append can't be generated when a default partition has been declared. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: