Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activityview?
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activityview? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOBaU_aPixr3sj8Ov7o4eToOdA0f68ZV+Z4drn2LHn4QJTj8Tg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId forpg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId forpg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId forpg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:05 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > I'm actually quite unconvinced that it's sensible to update the global > value for nested queries. That'll mean e.g. the log_line_prefix and > pg_stat_activity values are most of the time going to be bogus while > nested, because the querystring that's associated with those will *not* > be the value that the queryid corresponds to. elog.c uses > debug_query_string to log the statement, which is only updated for > top-level queries (outside of some exceptions like parallel workers for > parallel queries in a function or stuff like that). And pg_stat_activity > is also only updated for top level queries. Having the nested queryid seems indeed quite broken for log_line_prefix. However having the nested queryid in pg_stat_activity would be convenient to track what is a long stored functions currently doing. Maybe we could expose something like top_level_queryid and current_queryid instead?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: