Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activityview?
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activityview? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOBaU_ZBZm=ZCPQScK_VpO7+0N=du0xEWv+uRdXQ718M6fv6UA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId forpg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view? (Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:45 PM Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com> wrote: > > But I think that enough to integrate into core the query normalization > routine and store generalized query strings (from which the queryId is > produced) in shared memory (for example, hashtable that maps queryId to > the text representation of generalized query). That's more or less how pg_stat_statements was previously behaving, and it had too many problems. Current implementation, with an external file, is a better alternative. > And activate > normalization routine and filling the table of generalized queries by > specified GUC. > > This allows to unbind extensions that require queryId from using > pg_stat_statements and consider such computing of queryId as canonical. The problem I see with this approach is that if you want a different implementation, you'll have to reimplement the in-core normalised queries saving and retrieval, but with a different set of SQL-visible functions. I don't think that's it's acceptable, unless we add a specific hook for query normalisation and queryid computing. But it isn't ideal either, as it would be a total mess if someone changes the implementation without resetting the previously saved normalised queries.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: