Re: WAL usage calculation patch
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL usage calculation patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOBaU_Z5dK=cMXTaEEgXNCY7GrsBnVfk4vwK2h7o+2Aowb33Qw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL usage calculation patch (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WAL usage calculation patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Justin, Thanks for the review! On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:41 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > Should capitalize at least the non-text one ? And maybe the text one for > consistency ? > > + ExplainPropertyInteger("WAL fpw", NULL, I think we should keep both version consistent, whether lower or upper case. The uppercase version is probably more correct, but it's a little bit weird to have it being the only upper case label in all output, so I kept it lower case. > And add the acronym to the docs: > > $ git grep 'full page' '*/explain.sgml' > doc/src/sgml/ref/explain.sgml: number of records, number of full page writes and amount of WAL bytes > > "..full page writes (FPW).." Indeed! Fixed (using lowercase to match current output). > Should we also change vacuumlazy.c for consistency ? > > + _("WAL usage: %ld records, %ld full page writes, " > + UINT64_FORMAT " bytes"), I don't think this one should be changed, vacuumlazy output is already entirely different, and is way more verbose so keeping it as is makes sense to me.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: