Re: [survey] New "Stable" QueryId based on normalized query text
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [survey] New "Stable" QueryId based on normalized query text |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOBaU_Yypcom2VxW4mEizx+wAzRdgsn-1jGyZH8seKiLxQNyxQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [survey] New "Stable" QueryId based on normalized query text (legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:10 PM legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you Julien for the workaround, > It is not easy to build "cross tables" in excel to join metrics per query > text ... then keep only one queryid over all environments, that's easy enough in SQL: SELECT min(queryid) OVER (partition by query ORDER BY environment), ... FROM all_pg_stat_statements if you have your environment named like 0_production, 1_preproduction... you'll get the queryid from production. Once again, that's not ideal but it's easy to deal with it when consuming the data. > and I'm not ready to build a MD5(query) as many query could lead to the same > QueryId I'd be really surprised if you see a single collision in your whole life, whatever pg_stat_statements.max you're using. I'm also pretty sure that the collision risk is technically higher with an 8B queryId field rather than a 16B md5, but maybe I'm wrong.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: