On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:48 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:33 PM Tomas Vondra
> > > <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > >> It seems this commit forgot to add PgStat_MsgChecksumFailure to the
> > >> PgStat_Msg union.
> >
> > > Oops, indeed. That's embarrassing. Trivial fix attached if that helps.
> >
> > Seems like this exposes a generic weakness in the way pgstat.c is coded.
> > I'm inclined to adjust the switch logic in PgstatCollectorMain along
> > the lines of
> >
> > - pgstat_recv_inquiry((PgStat_MsgInquiry *) &msg, len);
> > + pgstat_recv_inquiry(&msg.msg_inquiry, len);
> >
> > so that you *couldn't* forget to extend the union, as long as you
> > followed the existing code's style.
>
> I'll send an updated patch tomorrow
Here's an updated version. It turns out that PgStat_MsgTempFile had
also been forgotten and never noticed.