Re: Replication conflicts despite hot_standby_feedback = on?
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication conflicts despite hot_standby_feedback = on? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOBaU_Y6ezV6BCMt7NFjPY-veDrX=MEkThza11T-CKGccyS8PQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Replication conflicts despite hot_standby_feedback = on? (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication conflicts despite hot_standby_feedback = on?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:07 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote: > > I'm seeing the following at a customer site: > > SELECT confl_tablespace, confl_lock, confl_snapshot, confl_bufferpin, confl_deadlock > FROM pg_stat_database_conflicts > WHERE datname = 'something' \gx > > -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------ > confl_tablespace | 0 > confl_lock | 0 > confl_snapshot | 84990 > confl_bufferpin | 0 > confl_deadlock | 0 > > SHOW hot_standby_feedback; > > hot_standby_feedback > ---------------------- > on > (1 row) > > This is PostgreSQL 11.7, the standby didn't disconnect from the primary, and > the number of replication conflicts is growing. > > I had thought that "hot_standby_feedback = on" would get rid of such > conflicts. > > In the code I see a lot of call sites for ResolveRecoveryConflictWithSnapshot, > so it is hard for me to track this down. Does anybody know what could cause > these replication conflicts? One of the frequent causes is the lock acquired by (auto)vacuum when truncating the trailing empty blocks, maybe you can correlate your conflicts with autovacuum activity?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: