Re: [DOCS] Correction
От | Gokhan Demir |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Correction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOBOzNrPGOCcUtE8cNijysWj2DNb_v8iUYgnMi58awg=nrmEJg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Correction (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
Hi Tom,
Then I guess I will need to read that part of the chapter again.
Many thanks for the clarification.
Gokhan.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
demirgokhan@gmail.com writes:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/datatype-json. html
> Description:
> Shouldn't be below statement:
> "Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries with the
> @> operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default operator
> class jsonb_ops."
> corrected to:
> "Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries with the ?
> operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default operator
> class jsonb_ops."
Uh, no, I don't think so:
regression=# select oid from pg_opfamily where opfname = 'jsonb_path_ops';
oid
------
4037
(1 row)
regression=# select amopopr::regoperator from pg_amop where amopfamily = 4037;
amopopr
-----------------
@>(jsonb,jsonb)
(1 row)
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: