Re: postgres in swap space
| От | Ron Johnson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: postgres in swap space |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANzqJaDw_W26Gj2w9hVzJ0u4Qjrj_NxXp2XWJvaAHz24zRoRaA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: postgres in swap space (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 4:41 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 11/17/25 13:12, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 3:50 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at
> <mailto:laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2025-11-17 at 18:25 +0100, Marc Millas wrote:
> > Can someone point me to any doc describing why and how much space
> postgres uses on the swap of a debian machine ?
> > it's an old postgres 10, because it is used by a product for
> which only this version is certified.
> > (no comment on that, please)
>
> I'm biting down a comment.
>
>
> "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" works just fine (until it doesn't).
The problem is when it doesn't work anymore, the work load to move to a
newer version is that much greater.
That's my point. If it just kept working, there would be no problem.
Keeping the version within spitting
distance of the latest supported version, to me, is a good idea.
As much as people love to complain about how useless PCI DSS is (see the recent thread on TDE), there's one benefit: ensuring that companies keep computers patched and running supported software.
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: